![]() ![]() In summary, SonarQube offers advanced analysis, a centralized dashboard, cross-platform support, and integration capabilities that make it a valuable addition to your organization's code quality practices. Visual Studio Code Analysis can be used during development within the IDE, while SonarQube can be incorporated into your CI/CD pipeline for a more comprehensive analysis. Regarding using both SonarQube and Visual Studio Code Analysis, it is possible to use both tools in combination. This integration helps in enforcing code quality gates, tracking issues, and ensuring continuous improvement. Integration Capabilities: SonarQube integrates with various CI/CD tools, source code repositories, and issue trackers, allowing for seamless integration into your development workflow. ![]() ![]() This enables you to maintain consistent code quality across different platforms and technologies, providing a unified view of your codebase. It offers powerful reporting capabilities, historical trends, and project-level metrics, making it easier to track code quality over time.Ĭross-platform Analysis: SonarQube supports analyzing not just ASP.NET MVC and Web API projects but also Android and iOS apps. It offers a customizable ruleset to align with your organization's coding standards and best practices.Ĭentralized Dashboard: SonarQube provides a user-friendly and customizable dashboard that consolidates analysis results and presents them in a visually appealing manner. It covers a wider range of programming languages, including HTML and JavaScript, which can provide a more holistic view of your codebase.Īdvanced Rules and Quality Profiles: SonarQube provides an extensive set of rules and quality profiles that can help identify code smells, security vulnerabilities, and maintainability issues. Except that I can control the rules applied in one, and not the other (big wigs want common rules applied across all products!)Ĭertainly! Here are some pointers to make a case for using SonarQube:Ĭomprehensive Analysis: SonarQube offers a more comprehensive analysis compared to Visual Studio Code Analysis. In the end, as a developer I don't see much added value of having both tools in play. I never yet figured out how to send the code coverage from unit tests. So take the "time to fix" estimate with a grain of salt. In fact, in one case fixing the issue caused the software to fail in other ways as there were things depending on this broken implementation. I went and fixed its top critical reported bugs, but they're not real bugs. Using the default set of rules, Sonar again Reports so many "Bugs" that its next to in-usable. I got our TFSBuild to send the data into SonarQube from the daily builds. So the company wanted all products in one place. Yes rule set has grown a bit as we fixed things. ![]() (The default set was giving so many messages it was impossible to find useful things) These found several "bugs" when we did this, and have helped along the way since then. In 2010, we started using code analysis in VS, with a pared down set of code analysis rules for the absolute must-have stuff. huge legacy code base, no common style across the whole thing since it's the result of 15+ years of work. Recently put our solution into sonar cube. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |